<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Blogirific.com Blog &#187; internet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.blogirific.com/category/blog/internet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.blogirific.com</link>
	<description>Blogirific.com Blog Directory</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 21:59:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Free Autoresponder For Bloggers and Internet Marketers</title>
		<link>http://blog.blogirific.com/blog/internet/free-autoresponder-for-bloggers-and-internet-marketers/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.blogirific.com/blog/internet/free-autoresponder-for-bloggers-and-internet-marketers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 23:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free autobot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free autoresponder]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.blogirific.com/?p=67</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was looking into using an autoresponder and creating a list. I have decided against doing this for now as I really don&#8217;t have enough to say at this point. Hopefully in the future I can continue with making a newsletter and give my readers some real value.
Anyways, my point is that if you just [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was looking into using an autoresponder and creating a list. I have decided against doing this for now as I really don&#8217;t have enough to say at this point. Hopefully in the future I can continue with making a newsletter and give my readers some real value.</p>
<p>Anyways, my point is that if you just don&#8217;t have the money to pay for a service like AWeber or anything like it, you can use <a href="http://freeautobot.com" target="_blank">http://freeautobot.com</a> I know quite a few people using it and they have yet to have any problems with it. (Well, no major problems. Any service or software will occasionally have small problems, even the one&#8217;s you pay big bucks for, but you know that.)</p>
<p>So head on over to <a href="http://freeautobot.com" target="_blank">http://freeautobot.com</a> and get your free autobot today!</p>
<img src="http://blog.blogirific.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=67&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.blogirific.com/blog/internet/free-autoresponder-for-bloggers-and-internet-marketers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How To Build A Better Future For The Web</title>
		<link>http://blog.blogirific.com/blog/internet/how-to-build-a-better-future-for-the-web/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.blogirific.com/blog/internet/how-to-build-a-better-future-for-the-web/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 04:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[better future for the web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tim o'reilly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web 2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.blogirific.com/?p=15</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tim O&#8217;Reilly (O&#8217;Reilly Media, Inc.), &#8220;The O&#8217;Reilly Radar&#8221; keynote speech at Web 2.0 Expo New York 2009

- An ugly time in the web&#8217;s earliest years were times when there was browser wars.
- Tim O&#8217;Oreilly sees another &#8220;ugly time&#8221; coming. It may be another browser war.
- Talks about Rupert Murdoch thinking about removing their content from [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Tim O&#8217;Reilly (O&#8217;Reilly Media, Inc.), &#8220;The O&#8217;Reilly Radar&#8221; keynote speech at Web 2.0 Expo New York 2009</strong></p>
<p><object width="560" height="340"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/EYRC8nfZ67M&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/EYRC8nfZ67M&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="340"></embed></object></p>
<p>- An ugly time in the web&#8217;s earliest years were times when there was browser wars.<br />
- Tim O&#8217;Oreilly sees another &#8220;ugly time&#8221; coming. It may be another browser war.<br />
- Talks about Rupert Murdoch thinking about removing their content from Google&#8217;s search results and only have Bing list his content.<br />
- Seems as if there&#8217;s always someone or some company that is at war with the web.<br />
- Takes a look at cloud computing. Services like <a href="http://aws.amazon.com/" target="_blank">Amazon Web Services</a>, <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/windowsazure/windowsazure/" target="_blank">Windows Azure</a> and <a href="http://code.google.com/appengine/" target="_blank">Google App Engine</a>.<br />
<strong>- He makes the point that the cloud computing services listed above is not the &#8220;web&#8217;s platform&#8221;, but instead it&#8217;s &#8220;Amazon&#8217;s Platform&#8221; or &#8220;Microsoft&#8217;s Platform&#8221; or &#8220;Google&#8217;s Platform&#8221; which lends him to think this is a another sign of a platform war going on.<br />
</strong>- There&#8217;s always a counter reaction from open source groups like RedHat and their <a href="http://deltacloud.org/" target="_blank">Delta Cloud</a> for open API&#8217;s which makes it easy to incorporate all three.<br />
- Speaks about the phone wars and how companies like Apple and Google have phones which only allows certain kinds of apps to run on their phones, etc.<br />
- Apple for example, is playing by different rules. It&#8217;s not an open system like the web.<br />
- Apple decdides who gets to get their application listed, what that iphone app can do, when does it infringe on Apple&#8217;s business? This isn&#8217;t the way the web works.</p>
<p>Web 2.0<br />
- You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means!</p>
<p>- Tim O&#8217;Reilly calls web 2.0: &#8220;Building an Internet Operating System&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>Web 2.0 Principles:<br />
</strong>- Data is the Intel inside of the next generation of applications.</p>
<p><strong>The Internet Operating System:</strong></p>
<p>It&#8217;s subsystems are databases of:<br />
- People<br />
- Places<br />
- Things<br />
- Prices<br />
- Documents<br />
- Images<br />
- Sounds<br />
- Relationships<br />
- Trust metrics<br />
- &#8230;</p>
<p>And services that help people use them:<br />
- Search<br />
- Payment<br />
- Matching and recognition<br />
- &#8230;</p>
<p>- Talks about Google&#8217;s Android application &#8220;Turn by Turn&#8221; navigation. Says this is not something that could be built on a phone, but only on the web because it relies on vast databases and numerous cloud databases.</p>
<p><strong>Do We See The Beginning of a Showdown Between Apple and Google?</strong><br />
- Apple says to Google: you can&#8217;t run Google voice on the iPhone.<br />
- Google says to Apple: the new Google maps, with free turn by turn directions is only available for Android devices.<br />
- Talks about Bill Gurley&#8217;s post about these kinds of web wars. See Bill&#8217;s post here: <a href="http://abovethecrowd.com/2009/10/29/google-redefines-disruption-the-“less-than-free”-business-model/" target="_blank">http://abovethecrowd.com/2009/10/29/google-redefines-disruption-the-“less-than-free”-business-model/</a></p>
<p>- Says there are services in which Google can only provide for free. There&#8217;s services that only Facebook can provide for free. There are services that only Apple can provide for free and so on&#8230;<br />
- What he&#8217;s worried about is when these companies try and leverage this.</p>
<p>If the Internet is going to become an operating systems, with these interoperable data services are they used for leverage to create &#8220;One Ring to Rule Them All?&#8221; or are they going to be used in the style we&#8217;ve always seen with the Internet?<br />
- In which small peices are loosely joined? <br />
- In which the world is interoperable?<br />
- In which we use the best of breed of one player and the best of breed from another to bring together a new kind of application that doesn&#8217;t belong to any one of us but has to do with the free movement of users and information across the web?</p>
<p>- Talks about Brady Forrest&#8217;s blog post where he suggests some things Google might be able to do with their Turn by Turn Android app. See Brady&#8217;s post here: <a href="http://radar.oreilly.com/2009/10/navigating-the-future-take-me.html" target="_blank">http://radar.oreilly.com/2009/10/navigating-the-future-take-me.html</a><br />
- About Brady&#8217;s post: Tim O&#8217;Reilly makes the point that with some of Brady&#8217;s suggestions, Google can do some all by themselves and some Google could enlist the help of others. This would eliminate the &#8220;One Ring to Rule Them All&#8221; as Google would be incorporating other apps and technologies so if a person buys an Android based phone, the user doesn&#8217;t just have to stay within Google&#8217;s offerings in applications and the like.</p>
<p><strong>Tim O&#8217;Reilly&#8217;s Advice To Google:</strong><br />
Be Rigirous In Making Sure That The Users Benefits:<br />
- Free turn by Turn: Big user win.<br />
- Free speech recognition: Big User Win.<br />
- Automated translation: Big user win.<br />
- Free docs and spreadsheets: Big user win.<br />
- Face recognition: Big user win.<br />
- Google book search: Big user win.</p>
<p><strong>When You Forget To Be Rigirous In Making Sure That The Users Benefits: You Lose.<br />
</strong>Have a look at Google&#8217;s failures and they tend to be about competitiveness:<br />
- Froogle: Google&#8217;s attempt to eat Amazon&#8217;s lunch with no unique benefit to users.<br />
- Google Checkout: Google&#8217;s attempt to eat PayPal&#8217;s lunch with no unique benefit to users.<br />
- Google Knol: Google&#8217;s attempt to eat Wikipedia&#8217;s lunch with no unique benefit to users.<br />
- Google Profiles: Google&#8217;s attempt to eat Facebook&#8217;s lunch with no unique benefit to users.</p>
<p><strong>Great Advice From <a href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/" target="_blank">Jeff Jarvis</a>:<br />
</strong>&#8220;Do what you do best and link to the rest.&#8221;</p>
<p>- OpenID, Facebook API, Twitter API and more are opening up the web and redefining how people register and login to websites.<br />
- Don&#8217;t just open up because you&#8217;re the underdog. Example: Microsoft embracing open source stuff and such because Google is the clear winner.<br />
- Mark Twain said &#8220;Do the right thing. You will gratify some people and astonish the rest.&#8221;<br />
- We should really &#8220;get out there&#8221; and figure out what really is the right thing.<br />
- Talks about John Borthwick&#8217;s blog post &#8220;Lines in the Sand&#8221; <a href="http://www.borthwick.com/weblog/2009/10/30/lines-in-the-sand/">http://www.borthwick.com/weblog/2009/10/30/lines-in-the-sand/</a></p>
<p><strong>The Robust Principle:</strong><br />
&#8220;TCP implementations should follow a general principle of robustness: be conservative in what you do, be liberal in what you accept from others.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think <a href="http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/27" target="_blank">Tim O&#8217;Reilly</a> has a great point about the future of the Internet in that we should all work together to make it beneficial for all of us.</p>
<p>What do you think?</p>
<img src="http://blog.blogirific.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=15&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.blogirific.com/blog/internet/how-to-build-a-better-future-for-the-web/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

